Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '19 at 03:38
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 165
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 442
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 573
35% 573 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10C1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9924
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 30.5
28% 29.9 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 22.6
24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 387
Mixed 404
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 31.4
107% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 284
232% 326 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 115%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
908GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 129 129 131 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 123
Write 13.7
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 127
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2.1
421% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 70%
USB 3.0 320GB
289GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 109 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 81.6
Write 104
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 108
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 8.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback