HP Z220 CMT Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	18 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130516
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 31 '19 at 17:30
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	65% Good	Memory 79.1 1-Core 69.8 2-Core 167 61% 105 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 431 44% 354 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 121 125 113 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 168 Write 144 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 123 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 180 177 182 179 181 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 146 Mixed 76.8 SusWrite 178 104% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124 3,845 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4.5TB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 181 180 179 173 183 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
USB 3.0 2TB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 55GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 1.3 Mixed 26 SusWrite 14.9 14% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.2 284% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 106%
USB 3.0 320GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 43GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 28.3 Mixed 24 SusWrite 14.9 18% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 56%
ST1000DM 003-1ER162 1TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 7.5 9.6 9.6 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 27.8 Mixed 26 SusWrite 10.7 31% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 78%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 8.3 14 9.5 9.6 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 21.3 Write 19.7 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 10.6 24% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 43%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 931GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 6 9.9 9.6 9.6 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 27 Mixed 24 SusWrite 8.1 29% 22.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 48%
HUA72101 0KLA330 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 22GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	6.31% Terrible	Read 29.5 Write 6.8 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 0 12% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.6% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.2 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.8 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 CMT Workstation Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

System: HP Z220 CMT Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	615x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $200Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	107x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	71x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16