HP h8-1335ez

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP h8-1335ez (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120522
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '18 at 17:00
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 197 72% 127 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 518 52% 421 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570 12,360 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1B0A 90B6) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	4.99% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 5.72 5% 6.24 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 5.39 4% 5.38 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.99% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 439 440 442 450 451 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 443 Mixed 368 SusWrite 439 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 34.8 115% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 347 263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 124%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 1,970 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 233GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 290 288 290 291 292 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 384 Write 353 Mixed 348 SusWrite 301 78% 346 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 25 83% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 133 96% 123 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 98%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 60GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 11GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 61 62 61 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Read 141 Write 60.5 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 61.2 105% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 13.8 1,195% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 18.6 DQ Write 37.3 DQ Mixed 20.4 2,032% 25.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 153%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 1,027 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	49.2% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1335ez Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

System: HP h8-1335ez

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
RX 460AMD $90Bench 20%, 64,240 samples	1x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	2x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	1x

RAM
KHX1600C10D3/8G 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 KHX1600C10D3/8G 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 20GBKingstonBench 50%, 3 samples	2x
9905403-518.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,132 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $356

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16