Asus G10AC

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G10AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G10AC
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131121
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '21 at 20:31
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 92.9 2-Core 219 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 581 61% 490 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.6% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 37.1 Parallax 50.5 32% 42.2 fps	MRender 53.3 Gravity 47.8 Splatting 38.1 37% 46.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S37256G 256GB 443 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: KD1ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 150 136 130 127 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 364 Write 240 Mixed 231 SusWrite 143 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 93.2 4K Mixed 40.5 148% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 128 128% 209 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 90%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 311GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 463 466 476 478 477 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 456 Mixed 376 SusWrite 467 100% 442 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 46.8 164% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 354 269% 362 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB 6,219 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 15GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.6 5.5 5.8 5.1 5.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 20.1 Write 7.5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 5 12% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.6 172% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 13%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 146GB free, PID 61f5 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 203 204 211 213 212 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 273 Write 170 Mixed 196 SusWrite 207 276% 211 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 31.5 2,551% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 33.3 DQ Mixed 32.6 2,364% 33 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 377%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 60GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 45GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 68 63 61 60 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 119 Write 69.6 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 64.6 111% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 18.6 1,994% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 18.9 DQ Write 39 DQ Mixed 16.8 1,968% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 153%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GB 370 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 16.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 19.5 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	100	48.9"	1280 720	SAM0F21 C49J89x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	211x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	92x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	36x
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	22x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 370 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16