Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 29 '18 at 23:51
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 97.5 1-Core 150 2-Core 288 99% 178 Pts	4-Core 589 8-Core 1,076 100% 832 Pts	64-Core 1,631 101% 1,631 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 59.3 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 58 48% 60.7 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 58.8 Splatting 51.7 48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 492 Write 430 Mixed 339 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 32.2 128% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 175 139% 199 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 69GB free Firmware: 12.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 60 60 59 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 63 Write 66.2 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 59.7 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 60%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 51GB free Firmware: 04.01G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 35 34 34 34 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 36.7 Write 34.7 Mixed 25 SusWrite 34 24% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 34%
WD My Book 500GB 3,986 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 462GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 43 42 42 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 38.5 Write 38.7 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 41.8 52% 37.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 22%
ST1000LM 010-9YH146 1TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 862GB free, PID 1051 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 75 74 71 74 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Read 75 Write 84.2 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 72.9 96% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GB 3,530 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.7% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.13 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 7 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 48.3 83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $349

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,888x
Core i7-9700KIntel $265Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,616x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,310x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	652x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	643x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	861x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	569x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	490x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	282x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,290

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16