Asrock Z370 Professional Gaming i7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Professional Gaming i7  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 22:16
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 910
89% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,200
74% 1,200 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 200
Parallax 177
148% 186 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 180
Splatting 126
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
ASRock(1849 3E92) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6323
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 11.8
Parallax 8.66
7% 9.7 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 7.73
Splatting 16.5
11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1236 1460 1449 1623 1569 1426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,236
Write 1,702
Mixed 866
SusWrite 1,461
349% 1,566 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 72.8
257% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,225
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 1,050
803% 1,091 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 307%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
426GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 1187 1153 1189 1142 1035 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,052
Write 1,781
Mixed 785
SusWrite 1,199
325% 1,454 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 68.4
254% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,427
DQ Write 1,199
DQ Mixed 1,011
840% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 292%
Great: 302%
Seagate ST4000DM006-2G5107 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 134 138 156 146 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 172
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 139
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
273% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 126%
Seagate ST4000DM006-2G5107 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 142 136 149 144 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 173
Write 154
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 139
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.2
269% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 27.4
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 30.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 54.2
74% 54.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Professional Gaming i7 Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Professional Gaming i7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $782
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback