Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '18 at 07:04
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 822
74% 626 Pts
64-Core 2,546
158% 2,546 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 126
Parallax 128
108% 129 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 126
Splatting 102
106% 134 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2282 601 601 608 604 605 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,547
Write 2,286
Mixed 1,467
SusWrite 884
401% 1,796 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 91.1
299% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,068
DQ Write 966
DQ Mixed 993
751% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 294%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
52GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 479 479 479 479 481 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 473
Mixed 405
SusWrite 480
104% 463 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.8
199% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 362
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 109 114 119 111 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 155
Write 199
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 114
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 107%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
847GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 133 134 134 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 99
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 133
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 155 159 158 159 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 91
Write 126
Mixed 38
SusWrite 157
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.7
244% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 92%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
450GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 68 70 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 67.2
Write 66.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 69.3
92% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 20.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X399-E GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $885
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback