Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '18 at 02:24
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 215 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 580 63% 499 Pts	64-Core 587 36% 587 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Lighting 77.8 Reflection 77.3 Parallax 66.2 63% 73.8 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 70.6 Splatting 69.7 57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 317 296 282 174 171 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 460 Mixed 388 SusWrite 268 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 43.5 141% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 362 262% 334 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 140GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 139 137 137 134 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 152 Write 142 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 136 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 113%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 97GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 52.5 Write 53.3 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 90.8 77% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 44%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 38GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 52 50 49 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 82.3 Write 56.5 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 50.5 76% 59.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB 5,058 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.8 3.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	9.4% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 11.8 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 3.8 15% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.7 127% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.4% Great: 17%
Inateck 160GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 13GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 51 52 50 50 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 59 Write 59 Mixed 41 SusWrite 51.1 70% 52.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 22%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 500GB 682 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 84GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	21% Poor	Read 40.8 Write 36.7 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 41.8 52% 38.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 22%
Inateck 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 77GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 24 24 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.6% Very poor	Read 23 Write 21.2 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 23.5 30% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4G 16GB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.8% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 17.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,416x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,170x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,080x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	376x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	368x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	307x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	196x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16