Dell OptiPlex 3060

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 3060
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3060  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 07:31
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 455
61% 455 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Dell(1028 085C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Lighting 7.33
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 7.44
6% 8.47 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 15.4
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 4TB-$250
2TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,740
Write 6,515
Mixed 6,636
1,482% 6,630 MB/s
4K Read 538
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 290
1,305% 351 MB/s
DQ Read 1,650
DQ Write 1,408
DQ Mixed 1,522
1,142% 1,527 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 124%
Inateck ASM1153E 1TB
424GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 154 115 157 106 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 363
Write 230
Mixed 204
SusWrite 134
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 23.8
76% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 81.4
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 80.3
66% 92.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 65%
Inateck ASM1153E 250GB
190GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 136 129 128 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 369
Write 74.2
Mixed 266
SusWrite 131
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 24.9
83% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 123
89% 115 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 74%
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G M.2 2280 256GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ABDA4102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 188
Write 230
Mixed 154
142% 191 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 31.5
5,423% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 215
2,189% 263 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 121%
Inateck ASM1153E 1TB
651GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,475
Write 36
Mixed 76.5
1,333% 1,863 MB/s
4K Read 658
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 5.3
28,062% 222 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 107%
Inateck 1TB
701GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 134 129 128 132 132 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 78%
Inateck 1TB
319GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48.7
Write 33.5
Mixed 35.8
48% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 101%
Inateck 2TB
708GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 14 21 23 21 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 168%
Inateck 500GB
138GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 45 43 44 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.2% Poor
Read 45.5
Write 45.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 43.5
56% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Inateck 1TB
722GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 125 126 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 108
Write 124
Mixed 92
SusWrite 125
155% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KY7N41-MIE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 22.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3060 Builds (Compare 3,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3060

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback