Asus P6T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 24 '18 at 22:04
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 436
48% 380 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
XFX(1682 956D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1499 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 32.9
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 43.7
27% 38.4 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 40.4
30% 36 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Super Speed 240GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0956
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 93 113 38 79 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 144
Write 118
Mixed 117
SusWrite 87.7
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 8.8
46% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 16.8
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 10.9
9% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 38%
Seagate ST3640623AS 640GB-$192
394GB free
Firmware: SD43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 101 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 99
Write 94.7
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 101
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback