Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '18 at 21:31
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 89.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 214 79% 137 Pts	4-Core 393 8-Core 426 54% 410 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60 26,874 User benchmarks, average bench 10% HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.4 Reflection 12.2 Parallax 8.25 11% 11.3 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 12.7 Splatting 14.4 11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 708GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 87 131 143 150 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 119 Write 141 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 122 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 114%
FLASH Drive UT_USB20 4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 1167 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 18.3 Write 8 Mixed 7.8 12% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 6%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 2GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.1 4.5 4.3 4.3 4.4 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 3.8 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 4.2 8% 7.45 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 95% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung CL16-16-16 D4-2133 1x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 11.9 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	722x
Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	479x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	305x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	453x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	393x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	252x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	128x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $123

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16