PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100311 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 19 '18 at 18:15 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 167 172 171 163 MB/s
|
51.1%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
604GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 59 60 61 MB/s
|
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 58 59 60 61 MB/s
|
49.2%
Average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
209GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 68 69 68 69 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
TOSHIBA MQ01ABC150 1.5TB
815GB free, PID 0731
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 29 28 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 75x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 56x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 38x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 23x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 21x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |