Asus P5Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5Q  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 18:15
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 91.2
44% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 169
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 35.1
29% 33.2 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 36.2
Splatting 34
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 167 172 171 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.1% Above average
Read 212
Write 210
Mixed 193
SusWrite 160
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 32.8
95% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 45.9
38% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 134%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
604GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 57 59 60 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 61.2
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 58.6
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 54%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 58 59 60 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 112
Write 100
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 58.9
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
209GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 68 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 66.2
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 67.4
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABC150 1.5TB
815GB free, PID 0731
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 29 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 33
Write 29
Mixed 21
SusWrite 27.9
37% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.7
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback