Asus P5Q3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5Q3  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 30 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5470
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 114
52% 83.7 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 227
30% 226 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 113
Parallax 105
87% 108 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 101
Splatting 102
82% 100 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 180 193 198 199 201 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.6% Good
Read 254
Write 246
Mixed 230
SusWrite 191
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 39.7
127% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 188
139% 183 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 134%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
43GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 111 109 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 187
Write 139
Mixed 150
SusWrite 109
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 28.2
98% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 107
89% 129 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 61%
WD WD15EVDS-73V9B1 1.5TB
603GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 62 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 60.4
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 60.8
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 54%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 109 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 111
Write 104
Mixed 101
SusWrite 109
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
209GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 69 69 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 62.3
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 67.5
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABC150 1.5TB
681GB free, PID 0731
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 99.1
Write 92
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 102
109% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.7% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q3 Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $221
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback