Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics92.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602-4L/D16  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 16:29
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 57
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 189
59% 109 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 646
61% 506 Pts
64-Core 1,839
114% 1,839 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 83.3
Parallax 152
91% 116 fps
MRender 88.6
Gravity 126
Splatting 128
95% 114 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$42
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 210 221 225 224 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.7% Above average
Read 232
Write 212
Mixed 134
SusWrite 223
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 25
83% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 174
132% 177 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 115%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
466GB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1197 849 852 849 849 850 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,750
Write 1468
Mixed 1,414
SusWrite 908
310% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 45.2
160% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 630
DQ Write 451
DQ Mixed 544
405% 541 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 199%
Great: 284%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 200 200 200 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 122
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 199
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.4
288% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 113%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
1GB free
Firmware: C60F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.5
Write 33.3
Mixed 21.9
23% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 45%
WD RE4 250GB (2010)-$33
89GB free
Firmware: 1S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 79 91 103 102 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 101
Mixed 83
SusWrite 96.4
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 27.4
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback