Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602-4L/D16  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '18 at 12:11
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 163
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 653
58% 490 Pts
64-Core 1,648
102% 1,648 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.7% Very good
Lighting 86.1
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 87.7
70% 87.7 fps
MRender 89.1
Gravity 91.1
Splatting 119
84% 99.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$42
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 219 222 224 225 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.2% Good
Read 256
Write 242
Mixed 244
SusWrite 225
55% 242 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 28.3
93% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 176
135% 182 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 115%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
466GB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1218 853 853 856 856 856 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,854
Write 1,766
Mixed 1,580
SusWrite 916
343% 1,529 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 45.1
155% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 557
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 517
375% 489 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 199%
Great: 284%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 197 199 198 198 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 188
Mixed 76
SusWrite 197
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.5
298% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
1GB free
Firmware: C60F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 43.3
Write 45
Mixed 24.8
28% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 45%
WD RE4 250GB (2010)-$33
93GB free
Firmware: 1S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 84 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 111
Write 101
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 99.9
74% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.2
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback