Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602-4L/D16  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 15:09
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 190
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 721
64% 544 Pts
64-Core 1,838
114% 1,838 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.1.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 153
85% 114 fps
MRender 87
Gravity 118
Splatting 127
93% 111 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX300 120GB-$42
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 224 227 215 225 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 237
Write 224
Mixed 230
SusWrite 225
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 27.9
93% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 175
135% 182 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 115%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
466GB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1071 851 853 853 853 853 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,182
Write 1,021
Mixed 1,035
SusWrite 889
232% 1,032 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 45.1
156% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 595
432% 565 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 174%
Great: 284%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
2TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 198 197 198 198 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 139
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 198
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.5
302% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
1GB free
Firmware: C60F
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 44.9
Write 33.9
Mixed 23.6
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 45%
WD RE4 250GB (2010)-$33
93GB free
Firmware: 1S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 101 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 103
73% 98 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 29.3
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback