Asrock X99 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 18:57
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 608
63% 507 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1774 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 73.7
Reflection 71.3
Parallax 69.6
60% 71.5 fps
MRender 75.7
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 57.5
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 112 118 117 120 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 362
Write 424
Mixed 224
SusWrite 151
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 31.8
133% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 111
102% 162 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
897GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 112 112 79 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 110
Write 33.2
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 99.7
51% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 61%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
313GB free
Firmware: 0002BSM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 60.5
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 68.4
43% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
75GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 60 56 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 77.5
Write 79.1
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 58.8
47% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 61%
Generic SD/MMC 4GB
1GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 9 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
6.54% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 7.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8.7
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
26% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.54%
Great: 11%
Generic MS/MS-PRO 4GB
1GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.57% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 1.1
7% 6.72 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB-$115
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 34.8
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 OC Formula Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback