Asus H61M-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-D  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '18 at 09:05
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 90.2
1-Core 68.9
2-Core 125
60% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 174
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 362D) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 20.4
19% 20.4 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 17.1
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IET VIRTUAL-DISK 500GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 26 24 24 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 42.8
Write 19.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 23.5
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 5.5
864% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-037.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-D Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback