Asus P8H61-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '16 at 18:51
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 166
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 306
36% 282 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.200.1010.1002
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 87.8
57% 73.1 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 56.2
Splatting 80.2
56% 66.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
521GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 369
Write 301
Mixed 276
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 17.2
72% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 25.7
34% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
913GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 106
Write 112
Mixed 33.7
61% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 0.45
102% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
751GB free
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 170
Mixed 157
125% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.32
100% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-017.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M PRO Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback