Asus P7H55-M BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M BR  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100716
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 19 '16 at 20:22
Run Duration498 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 62.5
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 106
48% 78.5 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 155
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 59.9
50% 62.4 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 55.8
49% 61 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.3% Below average
Read 209
Write 110
Mixed 121
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 5.83
52% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 48.2
DQ Mixed 7.84
13% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 101%
Toshiba MK3265GSX H 320GB
282GB free
Firmware: GJ001Q Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 78.2
Write 79.6
Mixed 24.8
44% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.33
89% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
22GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Read 10.9
Write 4.57
Mixed 6.7
8% 7.39 MB/s
4K Read 2.66
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.83
75% 1.52 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 18%
ST 32GB 32GB
21GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.08% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 5.54
Mixed 9.27
14% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.78
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
19% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 9
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55-M BR Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback