Apple MacBookPro15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937A206F2EE63C01
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '18 at 20:36
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 17%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 707
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 837
52% 837 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
Apple(106B 0190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1470 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 23.5
Parallax 23
15% 21.8 fps
MRender 23.4
Gravity 17
Splatting 25.9
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0256 251GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 177.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,180
Write 46.5
Mixed 95.2
438% 2,107 MB/s
4K Read 572
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 5.9
876% 194 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 67%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
197GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 38 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
50% Average
Read 38.2
Write 38.5
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 38.8
53% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 10.4
762% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 11
DQ Write 15.1
DQ Mixed 12.9
993% 13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 50%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.9% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 21.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.8
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback