HP Z220 SFF Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z220 SFF Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1791
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120503
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 21:19
Run Duration	310 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368 2,442 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 184 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 501 52% 418 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.4% Poor	Lighting 35.8 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 37.4 29% 37.8 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 26.6 27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 183 91 14 39 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 445 Write 409 Mixed 340 SusWrite 111 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 4.9 59% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 120 103% 154 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 88%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 926GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.2% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 24.5 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 14 6% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 8.1 26% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 99%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2.5TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 25.4 Write 21 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 13.7 15% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.4 125% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 65%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 169GB free, PID 0888 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0 0.5 0.3 0 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.03% Terrible	Read 27.7 Write 0.2 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 0.3 5% 7.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.3 85% 3 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.03% Great: 151%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB 7,869 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	54.1% Above average	MC Read 22.2 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 16.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 9.6 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 30: 4R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
30%	9%	113	298	214	60	25.6"	1920 1200	HWP2869 HP ZR24w

History: Score 29: 3R 3G 5B | Score 38: 4R 5G 3B | Score 30: 4R 2G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z220 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z220 SFF Workstation

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	131x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	45x
Xeon E3-1225 V2Intel $248Bench 70%, 2,869 samples	38x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	66x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	50x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	37x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	11x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,893 samples	13x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	8x
M378B5773DH0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 1,226 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16