Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '18 at 17:00
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7960X-$347
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 259
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 1033
91% 774 Pts
64-Core 2,516
156% 2,516 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 133
Parallax 136
112% 136 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 134
Splatting 107
111% 140 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
161GB free
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 324 298 325 325 324 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,812
Write 1,251
Mixed 900
SusWrite 350
239% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 74.8
257% 91.3 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 674
DQ Mixed 752
562% 749 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 207%
Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1659 1679 1639 1648 1656 1642 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,012
Write 1,630
Mixed 879
SusWrite 1,654
346% 1,544 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 65.3
229% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 655
DQ Mixed 737
549% 730 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 285%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
75GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1839
Write 1,494
Mixed 609
290% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 55.6
201% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 632
DQ Mixed 614
485% 677 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 450GB
186GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 291 249 298 299 301 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 373
Write 334
Mixed 87
SusWrite 287
196% 270 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1.9
423% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 190%
Great: 188%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
800GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 119 114 120 118 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 119
Write 94
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 117
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 63.1
MC Mixed 41.9
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 11.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 120%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback