Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '18 at 16:51
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7960X-$347
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 129
2-Core 246
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 1,031
90% 769 Pts
64-Core 2511
155% 2511 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 135
Parallax 150
116% 142 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 136
Splatting 107
112% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
161GB free
Firmware: 4L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 321 302 321 321 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,850
Write 1,359
Mixed 1,084
SusWrite 346
257% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 76.8
255% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 821
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 752
561% 747 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 208%
Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1607 1656 1629 1627 1652 1641 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 1,918
Write 1,604
Mixed 865
SusWrite 1,635
337% 1,506 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 66.6
223% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 662
DQ Mixed 745
555% 739 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 279%
Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
75GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,786
Write 1,496
Mixed 709
294% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 49.7
192% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 625
492% 684 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 450GB
186GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 283 260 299 296 303 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 340
Mixed 93
SusWrite 285
196% 271 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 2
437% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 187%
Great: 188%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
800GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 118 113 120 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 119
Write 93.3
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 116
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 63.2
MC Mixed 41
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 11
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 119%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 705 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback