Monster TULPAR T7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7  (all builds)
MotherboardMonster TULPAR T7
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 03:05
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 197
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 484
54% 426 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 112D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.64% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 6.27
Parallax 6.72
3% 5.58 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.64%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 119GB
50GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 127 135 136 140 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 409
Write 158
Mixed 210
SusWrite 137
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 33.6
122% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 161
124% 169 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 101%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
542GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 89 74 99 114 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 84
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 71%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
474GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 86 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 92.5
Write 70.8
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 86.6
102% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH800SO51208-1600 Kingston KHX1600C9S3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9S3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $44
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback