Monster TULPAR T7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7  (all builds)
MotherboardMonster TULPAR T7
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 03 '18 at 02:12
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 196
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 330
42% 321 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 112D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 5.47
3% 17 fps
MRender 7.19
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 6.91
5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 119GB
73GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 118 130 137 138 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 388
Write 151
Mixed 192
SusWrite 132
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 35
132% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 160
122% 166 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 101%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
541GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 107 104 103 90 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 114
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 98.1
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH800SO51208-1600 Kingston KHX1600C9S3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9S3/4GX 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $44
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback