Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 25 '18 at 17:34
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.2% Very good
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
78% 166 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 723
74% 583 Pts
64-Core 882
59% 882 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Palit(1569 13C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
61.3% Good
Lighting 250
Reflection 210
Parallax 252
65% 237 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 217
Splatting 146
57% 176 fps
Poor: 54%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 66%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 550 488 549 541 535 545 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 675
Write 576
Mixed 442
SusWrite 535
125% 557 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 42.1
156% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 229
201% 308 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 123%
Great: 159%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$330
506GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 290 329 320 336 342 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 452
Mixed 443
SusWrite 324
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 54.3
186% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 350
264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
477GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1413 1406 1406 1408 1414 1408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 2,097
Write 1,419
Mixed 837
SusWrite 1,409
321% 1,440 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 61.5
215% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 951
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 824
616% 824 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 273%
Great: 352%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$79
1TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 171 172 170 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 136
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 171
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 113%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$90
309GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 100 100 88 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 82.5
Write 92.8
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 92.3
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 74%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 Max USB 3.0 64GB-$27
49GB free, PID 0247
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 84 83 83 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 122
Write 51.3
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 84.2
78% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$171
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 36.3
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 21.4
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 108%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X99M-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,197
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $145Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $185Nvidia RTX 2060 $349Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $83G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $70SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback