BBEN GB01

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemBBEN GB01  (all builds)
MotherboardBBEN-GB01 GB01
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '18 at 14:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 591
59% 479 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 38E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50% Above average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 64
49% 64.2 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 66.3
52% 63.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV6-8Q128 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2871301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 469
Write 104
Mixed 147
SusWrite 102
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 27.4
100% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 121
102% 153 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
905GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 120 121 124 123 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 120
Write 127
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 122
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD824A.C16FDR2 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.7% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GB01 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: BBEN GB01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback