Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130510
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 14:52
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 507
52% 417 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 71
Parallax 64.4
57% 68.5 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 56.3
52% 64.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 184 199 205 208 199 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 330
Write 207
Mixed 249
SusWrite 193
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 32.8
118% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 127
121% 191 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST32000641AS 2TB-$161
2TB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 121 121 122 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 120
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 73%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 133 136 138 141 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 139
Write 132
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 135
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.3
251% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 80%
Sony Micro Vault Mach USB 3.0 16GB-$42
11GB free, PID 05b9
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 33
Write 23
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 20.6
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12%
Great: 42%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
413GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 71
Write 65.5
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 68.7
78% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 29%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 9.7 9.2 8.9 9.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 61.7
Write 62
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 10.7
65% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 12
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $851
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback