MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B77
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 18:49
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 924
85% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,306
81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3603) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 188
Parallax 171
148% 180 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 179
Splatting 121
113% 140 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2166 681 610 613 615 612 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
276% Outstanding
Read 2491
Write 2,296
Mixed 1,588
SusWrite 883
405% 1,814 MB/s
4K Read 60.2
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 78.7
262% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 955
706% 934 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 276%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
10GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 476
Mixed 449
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 53.5
185% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 230
211% 324 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
176GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 186 187 187 187 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 140
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 184
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 25.2
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $888
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback