Apple MacBookPro9,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro9,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-6F01561E16C75D06
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '18 at 03:50
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 115
55% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 199
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Apple(106B 00FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.23
Parallax 2.66
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.43
4% 5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 386 187 111 115 2.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
69% Good
Read 436
Write 385
Mixed 366
SusWrite 198
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 19
89% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 51.1
105% 210 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA MK2552GSX 250GB
225GB free, PID 1900
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 37.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 38.3
45% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro9,2 Builds (Compare 461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro9,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback