Asus X99-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory17.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 03:50
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 540
48% 408 Pts
64-Core 677
42% 677 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.8% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 62.8
49% 62.1 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 51.9
48% 60.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 439
Write 425
Mixed 323
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 32.2
103% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 228
172% 230 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
17GB free
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,180
Write 879
Mixed 473
186% 844 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 31.4
101% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 267
195% 254 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 136 142 146 142 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 130
Write 109
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 140
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
22GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 28 13 15 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 103
Write 35.2
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 26.5
65% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.7
144% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-4GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2400C15-4GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2400C15-4GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR F4-2400C15-4GRR F4-2400C15-8GRR 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 41
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 19.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $748
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback