Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 13 '18 at 03:38
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 596
64% 512 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 71
Parallax 6.66
6% 28.2 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 14.3
9% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 40000E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 886 894 839 889 771 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,489
Write 886
Mixed 741
SusWrite 863
222% 995 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 59
209% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 532
476% 729 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 213%
Great: 225%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 138 128 138 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 130
Write 125
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 136
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
227% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 Kingston 9905624-043.A00G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 21.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback