Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E LX  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 07:41
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 426
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 118
Parallax 109
89% 112 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 103
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 202 205 209 200 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.5% Good
Read 242
Write 235
Mixed 213
SusWrite 202
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 41.7
136% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 39.5
DQ Write 88
DQ Mixed 52.2
43% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 124%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
12GB free
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 117 117 130 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.3% Below average
Read 240
Write 136
Mixed 159
SusWrite 121
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 7.9
53% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
414GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 115 115 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 105
Write 100
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 114
70% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 68%
Maxtor 6E040T0 40GB
7GB free
Firmware: NAN51680
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 56 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 39.7
Write 42
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 55.5
30% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 33%
Iomega E xternal HD 500GB
31GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 26.4
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 25.1
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.4% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback