Asus P7P55D-E LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E LX  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 07:34
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 166
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 428
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 117
Parallax 98.1
89% 108 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 102
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 198 199 206 206 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.6% Good
Read 237
Write 221
Mixed 207
SusWrite 202
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 39.4
128% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 37.2
DQ Write 86.3
DQ Mixed 49.2
41% 57.6 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 124%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB
12GB free
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 117 118 117 105 129 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.7% Below average
Read 238
Write 135
Mixed 157
SusWrite 115
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 7.9
53% 13.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
414GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 113 115 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61% Good
Read 98.6
Write 100
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 114
68% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61%
Great: 68%
Maxtor 6E040T0 40GB
7GB free
Firmware: NAN51680
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 55 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 41.9
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 55.4
30% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Iomega E xternal HD 500GB
31GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 25.3
Mixed 22.6
SusWrite 25.3
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D-E LX Builds (Compare 497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback