Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '18 at 00:09
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 177
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 472
47% 384 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.81
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 63.3
54% 65.6 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 57.3
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 276 278 279 276 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 470
Write 278
Mixed 272
SusWrite 277
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 30.1
108% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 245
206% 300 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 129%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
22GB free
Firmware: 10.02E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 7.2 9.2 9 9.9 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 56.7
Write 55
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 18.3
32% 43.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 35%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
618GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 183 185 188 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 153
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 186
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
ST940811 4A 40GB
30GB free, PID 0501
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 7.2
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 26.6
23% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBRL 04CD F3-17000CL11-4GBXL 04CD F3-17000CL11-4GBXL 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67 Extreme4 Gen3 Builds (Compare 209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock P67 Extreme4 Gen3 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $711
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback