Asrock A320M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock A320M  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '18 at 23:45
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 714
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 114
Parallax 109
88% 110 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 100
Splatting 101
81% 99 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 99 53 67 71 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 632
Write 373
Mixed 428
SusWrite 112
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 52.7
190% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 180
159% 229 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
78GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 465 462 462 468 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 470
Mixed 428
SusWrite 454
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54.2
184% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 308
247% 347 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
902GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 173 174 176 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 109
Mixed 79
SusWrite 174
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 32.9
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback