Asrock A320M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics82.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock A320M  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '18 at 11:01
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 226
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 341
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.9% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 109
Parallax 103
85% 105 fps
MRender 95.3
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 97.6
79% 96.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 176 53 61 66 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 630
Write 346
Mixed 426
SusWrite 112
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 49.2
182% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 177
150% 212 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
78GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 462 462 459 468 468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 469
Mixed 426
SusWrite 462
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.5
184% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 307
247% 347 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
879GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 169 171 168 170 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 133
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 170
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 32.3
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 27.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback