Asrock A320M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock A320M  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateOct 28 '18 at 19:38
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 77.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 714
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 95.5
86% 104 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 98.8
80% 97 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 108 71 73 53 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 613
Write 356
Mixed 424
SusWrite 112
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 43.7
151% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 30.2
35% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82%
Great: 107%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74
78GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 450 448 457 457 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 461
Mixed 417
SusWrite 444
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 45.7
149% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 300
241% 338 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
906GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 169 172 171 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 140
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 169
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FBD BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 32.9
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.6
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback