Lenovo 10FGS0EG00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 10FGS0EG00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '16 at 08:48
Run Duration80 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 246
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 657
69% 554 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
MSI(1462 3130) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 3.78
3% 3.89 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 5.22
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AAKX-08ANV 500GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 112
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.43
103% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 15
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback