Gateway FX6850

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGateway FX6850  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway FX6850
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '18 at 19:08
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 173
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 449
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 64.2
58% 68.9 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 55.5
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 464
Mixed 385
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 43.6
140% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD WD30EZRX-00DC0B0 802GB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 120 119 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 144
Write 143
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 118
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 81%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
88GB free
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 73 75 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58% Above average
Read 128
Write 123
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 74.4
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58%
Great: 74%
WD My Book 1235 4TB
409GB free, PID 1235
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 24.5
Mixed 22
SusWrite 26.6
35% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 2TB
242GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.2% Terrible
Read 28.3
Write 22.5
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 14
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.2%
Great: 44%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
63GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 22.3
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 13.7
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 21%
WD Elements 2TB
210GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 29
Write 22.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 13.6
28% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Other BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.7
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX6850 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway FX6850

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $272
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback