Acer Aspire M7811

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M7811  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer H57M01
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091231
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 16 '16 at 12:59
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 94.4
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 148
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 376
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6869
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 39.5
38% 43.8 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 37.9
32% 39 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.1% Very good
Read 266
Write 212
Mixed 169
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 38.7
123% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 106
99% 156 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 134%
WD WD30EZRX-00DC0B0 802GB
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 87.8
Write 79.7
Mixed 5.18
41% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.21
93% 1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 81%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
440GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47% Average
Read 84.5
Write 79
Mixed 18.6
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.32
92% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M7811 Builds (Compare 65 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M7811

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $407
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback