Base_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemBase_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME  (all builds)
MotherboardEVGA 150-SE-E789
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '18 at 21:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4960X-$1,189
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 590
65% 512 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP600 256GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 87 103 144 182 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 317
Write 265
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 132
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 35.6
126% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 75.6
96% 170 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS724020ALE640 2TB
676GB free
Firmware: MJ6OA5K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 129 128 123 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 103
Write 99.5
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 127
67% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm0_Manufacturer Dimm0_ Dimm1_Manufacturer Dimm1_ Dimm2_Manufacturer Dimm2_ Dimm3_Manufacturer Dimm3_ Dimm4_Manufacturer Dimm4_ Dimm5_Manufacturer Dimm5_ Dimm6_Manufacturer Dimm6_ Dimm7_Man... 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.2% Excellent
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 34.7
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MODEL_NAME Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

System: Base_board_manufacturer MODEL_NAME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback