Lenovo 255522G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 255522G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '18 at 09:15
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 516
57% 450 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
MSI(1462 1270) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.23
Reflection 9.04
Parallax 2.03
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 6.48
5% 6.71 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 118 59 111 43 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
38% Below average
Read 478
Write 418
Mixed 410
SusWrite 126
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 135 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 175
Write 141
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 137
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ED58E8W1600 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0443 RMR5030ED58E8W1600 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 255522G Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 255522G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback