Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '18 at 06:18
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 48.4
2-Core 96.6
48% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 193
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 71.1
Reflection 70.4
Parallax 62
58% 67.8 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 70.3
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 5.4 106 40 4.4 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 256
Write 116
Mixed 166
SusWrite 78.8
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 17.4
73% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 19.3
56% 117 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
233GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 120 119 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 76
SusWrite 119
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
362GB free
Firmware: CC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 109 107 111 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 125
Write 121
Mixed 67
SusWrite 108
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.5
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback