Asus F1A75-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus F1A75-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '18 at 14:01
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 94
47% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 170
24% 177 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Lighting 71.4
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 62.5
58% 68.1 fps
MRender 74.4
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 71
58% 71 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 112 6.9 88 27 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 370
Write 112
Mixed 211
SusWrite 87.7
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 17.7
73% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 18.6
54% 114 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
233GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 121 120 121 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 121
Write 120
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 119
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
408GB free
Firmware: CC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 111 112 112 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 110
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.8
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-V PRO Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-V PRO - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $213
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback