Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '18 at 23:25
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 233
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 762
75% 614 Pts
64-Core 881
54% 881 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 195
Parallax 144
124% 164 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 147
Splatting 123
101% 123 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 466 471 435 396 395 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 476
Mixed 453
SusWrite 437
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 54.6
179% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 292
240% 342 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
83GB free
Firmware: JC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80
Write 78.3
Mixed 54.5
53% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88% Excellent
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 31.8
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,060
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback