Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '18 at 06:42
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56.1% Above average	Memory 84.1 1-Core 56.1 2-Core 111 53% 83.9 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 167 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.10.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 40.5 Reflection 29.1 Parallax 50.6 33% 40.1 fps	MRender 27.8 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 35.7 28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 902GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 352 362 370 384 383 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 370 Write 386 Mixed 335 SusWrite 363 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 70.6 4K Mixed 45.9 149% 50.5 MB/s	DQ Read 39.3 DQ Write 95 DQ Mixed 54.1 45% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39 55,121 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 814GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 95.9 Write 91.4 Mixed 73 SusWrite 74.1 62% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 99U5471-001.A00LF CT102464BD160B.C16 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	22x

GPU
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	7x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x

RAM
99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF Team--Elite-133300 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 4 samples	3x
M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 18GBNanyaBench 27%, 6 samples	3x
DDR3 2000G DDR3 2000G Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF 12GBAdataBench 27%, 9 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16