PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X299 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20171002 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 23 '18 at 21:39 |
Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 80% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
|
90.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
735GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 384 408 380 393 394 MB/s
|
96.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 178 173 178 178 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Elements 1078 2TB
952GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 38 35 38 38 MB/s
|
19.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Passport 0740 1TB
53GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 22 23 26 26 25 MB/s
|
16%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 107C 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 147 141 149 147 MB/s
|
59.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 48x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 24x |
Core i7-9800XIntel $545Bench 83%, 4,003 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 17x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 14x |
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Outstanding | Total price: $498 |