ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AD5
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '18 at 14:50
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 204 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 475 51% 403 Pts	64-Core 505 31% 505 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Lighting 73.6 Reflection 79.8 Parallax 68.3 60% 73.9 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 70.2 Splatting 75.5 59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 317GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 454 463 489 483 482 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 996GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 106 108 108 108 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 104 Write 98.8 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 106 66% 89.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 83%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB 9,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 220 228 222 220 230 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 218 Write 215 Mixed 104 SusWrite 224 139% 190 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 1.7 390% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 138%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP698650-154-KEB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB HP698650-154-KEB Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.8% Above average	MC Read 19.5 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.6 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 17.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback